Whale Shark Project

whale sharkThe Whale Shark is the biggest fish in the sea and there are only a few actual whale species larger than it. Suggested to reach up to 21 meters and 34 tonnes it seems difficult to believe that Whale Sharks feed on microscopic plankton rarely more than 3 mm in size. The combination of its immense size and characteristic checkerboard pattern makes the Whale Shark almost unmistakable and completely unforgettable.
There is a great deal of mystery surrounding the life history of Whale Sharks due to the difficulty and costs involved in studying them. Therefore, much of the information we have on Whale Sharks is based on a limited amount of evidence resulting in a certain degree of uncertainty.

The Shark Trust and Project Aware have teamed up to initiate the Whale Shark Project. We are also working in collaboration with ECOCEANS and other Whale Shark projects around the globe. This project aims to catalogue images of Whale Sharks sent in by divers, sailors, researchers and anyone else who spots a Whale Shark and has a camera. The project will continually update a database of images from all over the world allowing us to match up images of the same Whale Sharks once enough images are received.

Whale Sharks display distinguishable and recognisable identification markings. These may be in the form of natural markings (pigmentation) or acquired markings (scars, injuries), which are unique to individual animals. Each Whale Shark has a unique, distinctive pattern of light pigmented spots along the forward flanks which have proved to be effective in differentiating individual sharks, as have scars and injuries to the first dorsal fin. The pattern of light pigmented spots and coloration of Whale Sharks is unique to each individual. Therefore, when diving with Whale Sharks, these areas should be targeted for the most useful photos.

If you are going diving with Whale Sharks or just happen to spot one from a boat, one of you photographs could help increase biologists knowledge on the movement and biology of these massive creatures.

Tagged | Leave a comment

Land programme

We Need To Buy Land Such As this To Protect Pumas, Eagles, Condors,Armadillos, Guanaco, Small Deer [Pudu], Wild Boar, Red Deer, Skunk, Wolves & Wildcat.

Steppe is the typical environment of most of Patagonia, & covers a huge area of land. It is one of the biggest single habitats in the entire world & is around 750,000km2 in size (to clear things up, it is 5 times bigger than England for example). The Steppe can be separated into a number of subdivisions, including the Coastal Steppe, which covers up almost 3000 km, & consists of a strikingly stunning coastline. None of this was protected as National Parks or nature reserves. Most land programmes preservation efforts had gone into protecting the more known pampas, the rainforests of the Andes & maritime environments.

What we want to do is develop a sort of eco tourism lodge; therefore our urgent Patagonian land programme is set up for buying land. With the help and support of our Argentinean partners, Pumas, Eagles, Condors, Armadillos, Guanaco, Small Deer [Pudu], Wild Boar, Red Deer, Skunk, Wolves & Wildcats will preserve their natural habitat. World Wildlife Foundation hopes to raise a lot more funds to develop the project and carry on its aims.

Posted in Lands | Tagged | Leave a comment

Heritage sites in flashlight

Lot1(a)”The Caves of the Painted Hands” are World renowned & generate continuous global publicity from TV, newspapers, academia, artistic comment & [currently] from postage stamps portraying the World famous paintings. The name of the surrounding host conservation range-park will be forevermore associated with “The Caves of the Painted Hands”.

Lot 1(b). Los Pinos. Here are 108 square miles [69,160 acres] of perfect range for wildlife. This range-land includes good stands of Molle forest amidst undisturbed range for Rheas [American Ostrich], Pumas, Guanacos, Armadillo, Skunk, Andean Condor, Red-Backed Hawk, the rare Huemel deer & so many more animals, crucially, with their food chain intact. Small lakes dot the landscape & give animals a choice of watering holes which gives them a greater chance of escaping predators. This assists the well balanced wildlife population.

Lot 1(c). Flamingo Lake range lands. Here are 38 square miles [24,700 acres] of pristine environment surrounding the lake that attracts a great number of birds to nest & feed. This is one of the most important bird colony sites in all of Latin America. The isolation, availability of food & undisturbed tranquillity are the qualities that attract the bird colonies & this guarantees, for the time being, the habittat for the birds. The conservation buying programme will firmly underpin the future here. Birds include the blacked neck Swan, 20 species of duck, Coots, many species of Geese, Coscoroba Swans [the smallest swans], Rheas [American Ostrich], Flamingos & many more.

Lot 4. The Lake itself [see above at number 3] is 4,940 acres or about 7.7 square miles of sparkling tranquillity.

For more nformation regarding the lands, please contact the World Wildlife Foundation.

Posted in Alarm signals, Lands | Tagged | Leave a comment

Asian Elephants

asian elephantCultural Importance: Humans use elephants in Asia to log forests, transport heavy loads and carry tourists. Elephants can walk in areas where machines are unable to navigate. About 15,000 Asian elephants are held in captivity as work animals. Elephants are important in Asian folklore and religion. They are believed to be cousins of the clouds and able to cause lightening.

Threats To Survival: The loss of habitat is the primary threat to Asian elephants. Approximately 20% of the world’s population lives in or near the range of Asian elephants. The homes of these elephants are being cleared for many reasons including warfare, agricultural development, human settlement, and logging. Asian elephants are less prone to poaching (killing elephants for ivory tusks) because few males (and no females) grow tusks. In China, the penalty for poaching is the death sentence.
Conflicts between Asian elephants and humans often occur because of habitat destruction. Sometimes there is not enough food in small forests to sustain elephants, so they look for the nearest source which is usually the field of a local farmer.

Protect the wild ones

Tagged | Leave a comment

Wild horses and environment

The Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act recognizes the wild horse as an “integral component of the natural system.” It stipulates that horses can only be removed from public lands if it is proven that they are overpopulating or are causing habitat destruction. It further mandates that the government “maintain specific ranges on public lands as sanctuaries for their protection and preservation.”

The horse’s digestive system does not thoroughly degrade the vegetation it eats. As a result, it tends to “replant” its own forage with the diverse seeds that pass through its system undegraded. This unique digestive system greatly aids in the building up of the absorptive, nutrient-rich humus component of soils. This, in turn, helps the soil absorb and retain water upon which many diverse plants and animals depend. In this way, the wild horse is also of great value in reducing dry inflammable vegetation in fire-prone areas. Back in the 1950s, it was primarily out of concern over brush fires that Storey County, Nevada, passed the first wild horse protection law in the nation.

The fact that horses wander much farther from water sources than many ruminant grazers adds to their efficacy as fire preventers. This tendency to range widely throughout both steep, hilly terrain and lower, more level areas, while cattle concentrate on lower elevations, also explains why horses have a lesser impact on their environment than livestock: unlike cattle that will camp on and destroy a riparian area, a wild horse herd will water in a quick and orderly fashion, then move on to highland grazing areas rarely frequented by cattle; unlike cows, horses do not defecate in the water.

Horses have also proven useful to other species they share the range with: in winter months, they open up frozen springs and ponds with their powerful hooves, making it possible for smaller animals to drink. Another positive effect of wild horses on biodiversity was documented in the case of the Coyote Canyon horses in the Anza Borrega National Park (California). After wild horses were all removed from the Park to increase big horn sheep population, bighorn sheep mortality actuality skyrocketed: mountain lions – wild horse predators – compensated the loss of one of their prey species by increasing their predation on other species.

More information on the specie and its issues through the pages of The American Wild Horses Preservation Campaign.

Posted in Alarm signals | Tagged | Leave a comment

Origins of bats

batsEvolution is a word saturated with meanings. To some it connotes a progressive diversification of life culminating with Homo sapiens, to some the development of a system or an idea. Charles Darwin described the process as “descent with modification”, and modern biologists define evolution as change with continuity in successive generations of organisms. We know that all animal populations change as time progresses, and that this change is often dictated by the environment. Each newborn generation sees a certain percentage of it’s members live to reproduce. Most of the time the individuals who survive to reproduce are simply a matter of chance, but sometimes an individual wins the genetic lottery and is born with a combination of traits that give it an advantage. If these traits lead to the production of a greater than average number of offspring these advantageous traits will be passed on, and over a number of generations will become common in the population. This process is know as natural selection, and it drives evolutionary change.

Today there are hundreds of species of bats, belonging to the single order Chiroptera. As mammals they came from a long lineage of animals that arose from the Therapsid reptiles in the Triassic, some 120 million years ago (mya). They were nocturnal, insectivorous, and had highly developed senses of smell and hearing. Most of all they were small, and occupied the fringe niches of a planet dominated by dinosaurs.

The earliest fossil bat is Icaronyteris index, and dates from 50 mya. I. index appears to be fairly modern, and we believe that it could echolocate based on the size and shape of its cochlea. There are a few other fossils, but most of our knowledge of bat evolution relies on other types of evidence. We know that since the time of I. index bats have diversified to fill a wide variety of niches, and we can imagine how bats like I. index changed over time to become the species of today.

The more interesting problem is determining the evolutionary history of bats before I. index. Molecular studies that compare the percentile difference in the DNA of different species of bats estimate that the difference between the two suborders of bats is the same as the difference between most orders of mammals. Orders like rodents and primates began to speciate 80-65 mya, and we can speculate that bats got a head start on these. At this time we can not know for sure, but a safe guess is that bats were around to watch the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.

Evolving the ability to fly required a complex change in anatomy of the animals that became bats. Most researchers believe that bats and primates evolved from arboreal insect eaters, and that bats went through a gliding stage. The wings of bats can be thought of as two sections, the membranes supported by the arms and the membrane supported by the fingers provides the thrust and maneuverability. We can speculate that the membrane in the arms evolved first, and this would have been sufficient to glide from tree to tree with. For arboreal animals gliding uses less energy and is safer than climbing down the tree, crossing the ground between trees, and climbing back up another tree. Types of lizards, marsupials, and squirrels have all evolved gliding membranes. Bats would have preyed on insects, and animals that could control their direction would have had a selective advantage so the hand wings that define the Chiropterans would have evolved rapidly. Flight probably evolved before sophisticated echolocation, but it is clear that the latter was evolving early on in the history of bats and that this ability facilitated the diversification of bats into the hundreds of niches that they occupy today.

Written by Bryan Carstens, an OBC volunteer,and a MSU graduate who focused heavily on evolutionary biology. He is now in graduate school continuing his studies on bats.

Posted in Alarm signals | Tagged | Leave a comment